A previous one Ethereum The Foundation Engineer has raised concerns about the future of the platform and warned that the lack of clear leadership slows down critical development.
Harikrishnan Mulackal, who worked as a solvency expert and compilation engineer, pointed out that Ethereum’s upgrade process has become sluggish, with only one larger Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) Change proposed in five years.
Lack of leadership can harm the network
According to Mulackal, Ethereum’s decentralized nature has led to delays in decision -making. He noted that although decentralization is a key strength, it has also made it difficult to implement the necessary changes.
The only proposed EVM upgrade, transient storage, was scrapped almost at the last minute. He believes that the network without a more structured strategy could fight to be ahead of competitors.
That is why I left the Ethereum Foundation.
There is no clear and coherent vision for Ethereum and EVM, which makes progress in EVM impossible.
I have seen EVM changes repeatedly shut down because they do not check a certain box. The problem is that everyone has another … https://t.co/tkangynycx
– Hari (@_hrkrshnn) March 14, 2025
Mulackal suggested that the network prioritize the implementation over research and propose a schedule of a hard fork per quarter to speed up the improvements.
He claims that faster updates can help maintain the platform’s dominance in the blockchain space.
Internal disagreements can be a bigger problem
Mulackal’s concerns repeat similar warnings from the industry’s figures. Wintermute CEO Evgeny Gaevoy has previously said that Leadership issuesNot its technology, may be its downfall.
Gaevoy pointed out that there are contradictions within the organization’s leadership, with some who drive for market -driven incentives, while others focus on social justice goals. This internal conflict, he warned, could lead to setbacks.
Vitalik Buterin, one of the founders of Ethereum, has admitted the difficulties and apparently works to rearrange the leadership of it Ethereum Foundation. However, still up for battle is whether this development will support or undermine the basic values of the network.
The development slows down
Ethereum’s development rate has subsided even though it remains an important participant in the blockchain scene. Mulackal’s claim that only an important EVM modification was proposed in five years asks questions about whether the network can keep up with ideas from competing blockchains.
Before the “redesign” Ethereum, developers have always emphasized thorough research. However, Mulackal believes that this cautious strategy is currently withdrawing the platform. Ethereum should, he claims, concentrate more on providing useful improvements than spending years exploring possible dangers.
Image from Equiti, diagram from tradingview
Editorial process For Bitcoinist is centered on delivering thoroughly investigated, correct and impartial content. We maintain strict purchasing standards, and each page undergoes frequent review of our team of top technological experts and experienced editors. This process ensures integrity, relevance and value of our content for our readers.
